Cosmogenic isotope exposure dating

Content
  • Beryllium dating
  • Cosmogenic nuclide dating
  • Surface exposure dating
  • Cosmogenic isotope surface exposure dating of glacial landforms in Cumbria.
  • Historical Geology/Cosmogenic surface dating
  • Terrestrial Cosmogenic Nuclide Facility
  • 10Be for Surface exposure dating (SED)
  • Cosmogenic nuclide dating

Some cosmic ray particles reach the surface of the earth and contribute to the natural background radiation environment. It was discovered about a decade ago that cosmic ray interaction with silica and oxygen in quartz produced measurable amounts of the isotopes Beryllium and Aluminium Researchers suggested that the accumulation of these isotopes within a rock surface could be used to establish how long that surface was exposed to the atmosphere. Assuming a constant rate of production, the number of atoms of Be and Al that accumulate in a rock surface will be proportional to the length of time the rocks were exposed to cosmic ray bombardment and the respective rates of radioactive decay for each isotope. An age determined by measurement of the amount of each nuclide would be an estimate of the minimum time that the particular surface had been exposed, but would not date the maximum age of the surface exposure, that is, the surface could have been exposed for much longer than the minimum calculated age.

Beryllium dating

Paul Bierman; Cosmogenic glacial dating, 20 years and counting. Geology ; 35 6: Using cosmogenic isotopic analyses of less than two dozen samples, Mackintosh et al. No longer should it be considered a major player in postglacial sea-level rise. Until just 20 years ago, when pioneering work in accelerator mass spectrometry Elmore and Phillips, , cosmogenic isotope systematics Lal, , and geologic applications Craig and Poreda, ; Kurz, hit the presses, such conclusions were unreachable because many hypotheses regarding rates and dates of glacial processes were simply unfalsifiable.

In two short decades, we have learned so much about when glaciers and ice sheets retreated that it’s hard to imagine a world where glacial boulders were not targets for dating. Yet, children born when the first paper using cosmogenic nuclides to date such erratics was published Phillips et al. Mackintosh et al. They used protruding mountains as chronometric dipsticks e. For the most part, the model ages they calculate decrease with elevation, suggesting gradually thinning ice since the Last Glacial Maximum.

The important finding is that many of the erratics are young and found only below a certain elevation, setting limits on ice thickness in the past and restricting the timing of ice sheet lowering to the latest Pleistocene and much of the early Holocene. These ages are young enough that they are inconsistent with the East Antarctic Ice Sheet contributing significantly to late Pleistocene sea-level rise.

Similarly, the decrease in ice thickness that Mackintosh et al. Thus, they suggest that East Antarctic Ice Sheet volume changes are at most a minor factor in sea-level change after the Last Glacial Maximum. It’s not surprising that the authors avoided sampling bedrock underlying the erratics. In areas where ice has been frozen to the bed, concentrations of cosmogenic nuclides in bedrock often tell a garbled story Bierman et al. The chronologic gibberish results from intermittent exposure of the rock to cosmic rays; between periods of surface or near-surface exposure, radioactive isotopes are no longer produced but rather decay under a passive cover of non-erosive ice.

Those who want to date deglacial events refer to the fraction of cosmogenic nuclides left behind from prior periods of exposure as inheritance and do their best to avoid it Davis et al. For others, this inheritance is a treasure trove of information about the stability of landscapes under ice and the distribution of erosion as a function of landscape position Briner and Swanson, ; Colgan et al. In any case, the cumulative isotope concentration tells the story of multiple but inseparable periods of exposure and burial.

Measurement of paired isotopes in glacial erratics has been done before Davis et al. In glacial terrains, both north and south, paired isotope analyses of bedrock have become a powerful means for elucidating conditions at the bed of former ice sheets Briner et al. For Mackintosh et al. Many analyzed erratics are striated, faceted, polished, and subrounded—all clues that the ice that transported them was once, at least in part, warm-based.

Although there remain lingering uncertainties in these and other cosmogenic dates, there is no indication such uncertainties would change Mackintosh et al. The dates Mackintosh et al. Some of this reflects analytic uncertainty particularly for 26 Al , but much of the noise is likely the result of small and variable amounts of inheritance and erosion as well as unknown and unknowable periods of burial and snow cover Hallet and Putkonen, ; Schildgen et al.

It is worth considering the broadest implications of what Mackintosh et al. Most important is their suggestion that the East Antarctic Ice Sheet responds more to sea level than to direct climatic forcing, including changes in temperature and precipitation. The inter-hemispheric link Mackintosh et al. The authors imply that post-glacial East Antarctic Ice Sheet shrinkage is driven by rising sea levels that decouple ice from its bed and are the direct result of melting of northern hemisphere glaciers.

Even though the mass balance of the East Antarctic Ice Sheet appears stable or perhaps even positive at the moment, if greenhouse-induced warming ravages the Greenland Ice Sheet, history could repeat itself. Northern hemisphere ablation, via the sea-level connection, would once again diminish Southern Hemisphere ice, pouring more water into already rising oceans—a powerful, positive feedback.

If these linkages are correct, then the power of atom counting and the implications of Mackintosh et al. Figure 1. A fresh, young, angular erratic left perched on rounded, deeply weathered gneissic bedrock illustrates the complexity of cosmogenic dating in terrain where glacial ice has been frozen to the bed. This is the area above Pangnirtung Fiord on Baffin Island. The erratic has similar 10 Be and 26 Al model ages Bierman et al. Sign In or Create an Account. User Tools. Sign In.

Advanced Search. Article Navigation. Research Article June 01, Cosmogenic glacial dating, 20 years and counting Paul Bierman Paul Bierman. Google Scholar. Geology 35 6: I thank D. Clark and L. Reusser for comments improving this paper. Geological Society of America. You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor but no in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work. GeoRef Subject. View large Download slide. Volume 35, Number 6. Previous Article.

View Full GeoRef Record. Mid-Pleistocene cosmogenic minimum-age limits for pre-Wisconsinan glacial surfaces in southwestern Minnesota and southern Baffin Island; a multiple nuclide approach. Search ADS. Cosmogenic radio-nuclides from fiord landscapes support differential erosion by overriding ice sheets.

Using inherited cosmogenic 36 Cl to constrain glacial erosion rates of the Cordilleran ice sheet. Implications for cosmogenic dating of glacial terrains. Cosmogenic analysis of glacial terrains in the eastern Canadian Arctic; a test for inherited nuclides and the effectiveness of glacial erosion. Accelerator mass spectrometry for measurement of long-lived radioisotopes.

Exposure ages from mountain dipsticks in Mac. Felsenmeer persistence under non-erosive ice in the Torngat and Kaumajet Mountains, Quebec-Labrador, as determined by soil weathering and cosmogenic nuclide exposure dating. Cosmogenic chlorine chronology for glacial deposits at Bloody Canyon, eastern Sierra Nevada. Simulation of snow shielding corrections for cosmogenic nuclide surface exposure studies. Citing articles via Web of Science 5. Email alerts New issue alert.

Early publications alert. Article activity alert. Related Articles. Cosmogenic radionuclides from fiord landscapes support differential erosion by overriding ice sheets GSA Bulletin. D — Goldschmidt Abstracts Mineralogical Magazine. Pleistocene dynamics of the interior East Antarctic ice sheet Geology. Wisconsinan refugia and the glacial history of eastern Baffin Island, Arctic Canada: Coupled evidence from cosmogenic isotopes and lake sediments Geology.

View More. Related Book Content. Slow, patchy landscape evolution in northern Sweden despite repeated ice-sheet glaciation Tectonics, Climate, and Landscape Evolution. Close Modal. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use our website, you are agreeing to our privacy policy.

Cosmogenic exposure dating. cosmo. Text by Carrie Patterson, MGS. Cosmogenic isotopes are created when elements in the atmosphere or earth are . The cosmogenic nuclide concentration in a rock is Chlorine (36Cl) can also be used to date the exposure age of basalt lavas[4]. Once the ratio of cosmogenic to naturally occuring isotopes has.

How can we date rocks? Using cosmogenic nuclides in glacial geology Sampling strategies cosmogenic nuclide dating Difficulties in cosmogenic nuclide dating Calculating an exposure age Further Reading References Comments. Geologists taking rock samples in Antarctica for cosmogenic nuclide dating.

Skip to main content. Log In Sign Up.

Surface exposure dating is a collection of geochronological techniques for estimating the length of time that a rock has been exposed at or near Earth’s surface. Surface exposure dating is used to date glacial advances and retreats , erosion history, lava flows, meteorite impacts, rock slides, fault scarps , cave development, and other geological events. It is most useful for rocks which have been exposed for between 10 years and 30,, years [ citation needed ].

Surface exposure dating

The Earth is constantly bombarded by galactic cosmic rays, which primarily consist of protons. This secondary cosmic ray shower is rapidly attenuated as it travels down into the atmosphere. Only a very small fraction of the secondary cosmic rays, which mostly consist of neutrons, reach the surface of the Earth. These neutrons then collide with the elements that are found in rocks and soils, such as silicon, oxygen, calcium etc. But some of the spallation products are very rare yet sufficiently long lived to accumulate in measurable quantities in terrestrial rocks. One example is 10 Be, which has a half life of 1.

Cosmogenic isotope surface exposure dating of glacial landforms in Cumbria.

Unlike other dating methods, which tell us how long it is since a rock was formed, cosmogenic surface dating tells us how long a rock has been exposed on the surface. In some cases, as when the rock is a lava flow , this amounts to the same thing. But there are other ways in which a rock can become exposed, as for example when a glacier erodes the sediment covering bedrock: In the article on radiocarbon dating we have already introduced one cosmogenic isotope , 14 C , which is produced by cosmic rays from 14 N. For cosmogenic surface dating, the two most commonly used isotopes are the cosmogenic isotopes 10 Be , which is produced from 16 O and which has a half-life of 1. Because the isotopes we’re using have a short half-life , it follows that if a rock has been buried for a few million years the quantities of these isotopes will be negligible. But when the rock becomes exposed on the surface, and so exposed to cosmic rays, these cosmogenic isotopes will begin to accumulate in the rock. If we take all the relevant factors into account, and calculate, estimate, or simply measure the amount of cosmic rays a given rock is exposed to per year, and if we measure the quantities of the cosmogenic isotopes in a sample of the rock, then we can figure out how long the rock has been exposed. The quantity of the relevant isotopes in the rock will not simply grow without limit with longer and longer exposure to cosmic rays ; rather they will tend towards a maximum a secular equilibrium:

This study analyzes the cosmogenic isotope surface exposure dating method for its feasibility of use on Mount Rainier because, while this is a powerful method commonly used to determine glacial history, many factors that make cosmogenic isotopes difficult to use converge on Mount Rainer.

The relatively new technique of surface exposure dating SED utilises primarily the build-up of 10 Be in rock materials over time rather than its radiometric decay: Its amount and that of other cosmogenic isotopes e.

Historical Geology/Cosmogenic surface dating

The Cosmogenic Isotope Lab is one of three facilities in Canada that are currently producing cosmogenic nuclide targets , and one of only four facilities in the world to prepare targets for all four cosmogenic radionuclides 10 BE, 14 C, 26 AL, 36 CL used for Earth Surface Processes research. We do not do radiocarbon dating of organic materials such as bone, plants, artifacts, or art work. In the future we hope to prepare targets for protein-specific 14 C analysis. The Terrestrial Cosmogenic Nuclide Facility is made up of four chemistry labs and a computer lab: Cosmogenic nuclides are used to determine exposure ages and erosion rates of landforms and sediments, and exhumation rates of catchment basins. Production rates of these radioisotopes in minerals exposed to cosmic rays are very low i. Preparation of accelerator mass spectrometry targets takes a minimum of one week of mineral purification and an additional week to 10 days for target chemistry. In the case of 10 Be, 26 Al, or 36 Cl the chemistry involves ion chromotography and controlled precipitations. For the 14 C extraction from quartz we use a tube furnace and flux to melt the quartz and our custom built ultrahigh vacuum stainless steel extraction line to purify the 14 CO 2 gas. The wait times for accelerator mass spectrometry can be long months , during which time the required elemental analyses are also completed, either by our in-house ICP-OES or by other instruments off campus. The time for data reduction and initial interpretation ranges from a few hours to a week.

Terrestrial Cosmogenic Nuclide Facility

Use the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more. If you have previously obtained access with your personal account, Please log in. If you previously purchased this article, Log in to Readcube. Log out of Readcube. Click on an option below to access. Log out of ReadCube.

10Be for Surface exposure dating (SED)

Paul Bierman; Cosmogenic glacial dating, 20 years and counting. Geology ; 35 6: Using cosmogenic isotopic analyses of less than two dozen samples, Mackintosh et al. No longer should it be considered a major player in postglacial sea-level rise. Until just 20 years ago, when pioneering work in accelerator mass spectrometry Elmore and Phillips, , cosmogenic isotope systematics Lal, , and geologic applications Craig and Poreda, ; Kurz, hit the presses, such conclusions were unreachable because many hypotheses regarding rates and dates of glacial processes were simply unfalsifiable. In two short decades, we have learned so much about when glaciers and ice sheets retreated that it’s hard to imagine a world where glacial boulders were not targets for dating.

Cosmogenic nuclide dating

Здесь не было ни души, если не считать уборщицы, драившей пол. На противоположной стороне зала служащая закрывала билетную кассу компании Иберия эйр-лайнз. Беккеру это показалось дурным предзнаменованием. Он подбежал к кассе. – El vuelo a los Estados Unidos. Стоявшая за стойкой симпатичная андалузка посмотрела на него и ответила с извиняющейся улыбкой: – Acaba de salir.

Повернувшись, он направился через фойе к выходу, где находилось вишневое бюро, которое привлекло его внимание, когда он входил. На нем располагался щедрый набор фирменных открыток отеля, почтовая бумага, конверты и ручки. Беккер вложил в конверт чистый листок бумаги, надписал его всего одним словом: Росио – и вернулся к консьержу. – Извините, что я снова вас беспокою, – сказал он застенчиво.  – Я вел себя довольно глупо. Я хотел лично сказать Росио, какое удовольствие получил от общения с ней несколько дней.

Но я уезжаю сегодня вечером.

– На его компьютере уже стоял жучок! – Он говорил, стараясь, чтобы его слова были слышны между сигналами.  – Этот жучок вмонтировал кто-то другой, и я подозреваю, что по распоряжению директора Фонтейна. Я просто попал на все готовое. Поверь. Поэтому я и узнал о его намерении модифицировать Цифровую крепость. Я читал все его мозговые штурмы.

Laura Levy on Evidence of Past Glacial Changes